0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì¼÷¾Æ ¹«È£ÈíÀ» À§ÇÑ ºñ°­ Áö¼ÓÀû ¾ç¾Ðȯ±â¹ý È¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ã¼°èÀû °íÂû

Systematic Review of Effects of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Apnea of Preterm Infants

¾Æµ¿°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 20±Ç 3È£ p.225 ~ 235
KMID : 0606120140200030225
±èÀºÁÖ ( Kim Eun-Joo ) - »óÁö´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analysis the effects of nasal Continuous Postive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) for preterm infants using systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Thirteen peer-reviewed journals including preterm infants and apnea and nCPAP published between 1973 and 2013 were included. Effect size and statistics of homogeneity were done using STATA 10.0.

Results: The design for 9 studies was Randomized Control Trial. In most of studies the pressure of nCPAP was set to 4-6 cmH2O. The effect size of 5 studies for the effect on apnea rate using nCPAP compared to nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilator (nIPPV) showed that the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was -0.11 and was not significantly different (Z=0.41, p=.680). But the difference in nCPAP for nasal Synchronizes Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilator (nSIPPV) (subgroup) was significant (SMD=-.44). The effect size of 7 studies on effect for ventilator weaning of using nCPAP compared to nIPPV showed the Risk Ratio (RR) as 1.60 and was not significantly different (Z=1.12, p=.268). But the difference between nCPAP and nSIPPV (subgroup) was significant (RR=3.94).

Conclusion: The results indicate a need for an advanced care system and suggest continuous studies of apnea in preterm infants.
KeyWords
¸ÞŸºÐ¼®, ü°èÀû °íÂû, Áö¼ÓÀû ¾ç¾Ðȯ±â¹ý, ¹Ì¼÷¾Æ
Review, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Apnea, Infant, Premature
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
  
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed